Wikipedia reliable source.

As of September 2015, there is no article about Jimmy Capps on Wikipedia. Capps is mentioned in Wikipedia articles such as “Night Things,” “Out Where the Bright Lights are Glowing” and others, where he is typically credited for having playe...A More Reliable Wikipedia Could Come from AI Research Assistants A neural network can identify Wikipedia references that are unlikely to support an article’s …I agree with Zero, the source is reliable and due because it is a review of a book in question. It makes common sense to summarize the author's views in an article on that book. - GizzyCatBella 🍁 14:20, 1 March 2023 (UTC) Reply ; I agree with Biruitorul, the source is reliable.This is an explanatory essay about the the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline. Wikipedia's policies or guidelines thoroughly vetted by the community. Reliable sources must be able to be verified. This does not mean that any particular person at any given moment must be capable of verifying them.The historicity of the Bible is the question of the Bible's relationship to history—covering not just the Bible's acceptability as history but also the ability to understand the literary forms of biblical narrative. One can extend biblical historicity to the evaluation of whether or not the Christian New Testament is an accurate record of the historical Jesus and of the …

However, current Wikipedia policy is that reliable sources dictating content is the way to go. You can attempt to change this, of course, by proposing a proposal and getting consensus on an RfC about it, and if it meets that, then go higher up to make it a policy. Also, as well, if you think I'm wrong and want a third opinion, or a casual mediation with a …Even with dedicated and talented contributors, the nature of Wikipedia allows anyone to make content. Wikipedia offers a wealth of information, but consider double-checking content with another credible source before including it in your thesis or essay. Wikipedia is a widely used internet tool, but err on the side of caution as we look at why ...For example, Wikipedia:Reliable sources says newspaper articles are generally considered to be reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) recommends against newspaper articles for certain technical purposes. Editors must use their best judgement to decide which advice is most appropriate and relevant to the specific ...

Explain Wikipedia’s history and operations, and how these features can influence the site’s contents. Articulate the appropriate uses of Wikipedia. Participate in Wikipedia as an editor, creator and curator of original content. The Least Reliable Source, Or Is It? Wikipedia is a popular online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone. Wikipedia makes no guarantee or claim to be a reliable source of information. It has no formal peer review and yes, anyone with a phone/computer and …

If different reliable sources make conflicting assertions about a matter, treat these assertions as opinions rather than facts, and do not present them as direct statements. Avoid stating facts as opinions. Uncontested and uncontroversial factual assertions made by reliable sources should normally be directly stated in Wikipedia's voice.Because Wikipedia cannot be considered a reliable source, the use of Wikipedia is not accepted in many schools and universities in writing a formal paper, and some educational institutions have banned it as a primary source while others have limited its use to only a pointer to external sources.Low altitude aerial photograph for use in photogrammetry. Location: Three Arch Bay, Laguna Beach, CA. Photogrammetry is the science and technology of obtaining reliable information about physical objects and the environment through the process of recording, measuring and interpreting photographic images and patterns of electromagnetic radiant …Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. This section is primarily about Bankrate, not The Points Guy and the Reuters source does not mention The Points Guy. The source mentioning the company’s offices is not reliable - it appears to be a personal or PR blog. Partly done: Removed the sentence starting with 'London office' and its source. For the rest, I assume you mean request #3 ...

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - ask about specific sources. However, editors new to a particular topic might not realize some specific major publications are preferred as sources. Guideline WP:MEDRS suggests sources for medical text, but other subjects need recommendations for reliable sources, as well.

See also: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) Wikipedia's science articles are not intended to provide formal instruction, but they are nonetheless an important and widely used resource. Scientific information should be based on reliable published sources ...

Because Wikipedia is easily edited, it’s not considered reliable. But it is commonly used and can be useful as a starting place for research, especially for finding the sources that are cited in each article. In summary, here are some tips: When you find an article on Wikipedia, scroll to the end for the bibliographical information.For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an ...This is an explanatory essay about the the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline. Wikipedia's policies or guidelines thoroughly vetted by the community. Reliable sources must be able to be verified. This does not mean that any particular person at any given moment must be capable of verifying them.These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources. Overall, we rate Forbes Right-Center biased based on story selection that favors the right and the political affiliation of its ownership. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to some …Published: in a source with a reputation for editorial quality, and peer-reviewed if possible.; Reliable: it's a source you'd point a patron to if they wanted to know more.; Supports the text: the source should back up what is stated.If it doesn't, but is a good general resource for the topic (such as a specialty encyclopedia), consider adding the source to a "further …This concept of a 'reliable source' should be questioned itself. The media have so much power and we see this everyday. This is just one small example of what they are capale of doing. The sources have editors who have their own ideology, interests and perspective on not only journalism but also the world around them.

The definition of a credible source can change depending on the discipline, but in general, for academic writing, a credible source is one that is unbiased and is backed up with evidence. When writing a research paper, always use and cite credible sources. ... (.gov or .mil) - Government or military websites end in .gov or .mil, and in general are …For those preparing for retirement or who’ve already retired, a reverse mortgage is a potentially reliable source of long-term income. With a reverse mortgage, you tap your home’s equity and receive payments from a lender, all without havin...An anonymous reader writes "The BBC has up an article chatting with Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales. Wales views the Wikipedia site as an educational resource, and apparently thinks teachers who downplay the site are 'bad educators'. '[A] perceived lack of authority ... has drawn criticism from other ...Please refer to Wikipedia:reliable source. The Findings cannot be used as a reliable source or reference to this article. Also please familiarise yourself with the discussion about reliable sources, proposals and resolutions which were passed by the first and second arbitration commitee. :: ...Even with dedicated and talented contributors, the nature of Wikipedia allows anyone to make content. Wikipedia offers a wealth of information, but consider double-checking content with another credible source before including it in your thesis or essay. Wikipedia is a widely used internet tool, but err on the side of caution as we look at why ...According to Wikipedia:Reliable sources the published works of reliable authors like Bruce Fein can be used as sources. Oz346 09:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC) Reply User:Oz346 This document is written with so much bias and extreme hatred against Sinhalese ethnic group and is spreading false information about Sinhalese. This source is full of personal …Nov 5, 2021 · Wikipedia has community-enforced policies on neutrality, reliability and notability. This means all information "must be presented accurately and without bias"; sources must come from a third ...

That said, Wikipedia entries are generally at the forefront of any web research. They can be great sources for preliminary information on a topic and finding reliable sources through their notes, references, external links, and further reading sections. Here's how you can use Wikipedia for your research: Getting background information But sometimes, even the primary sources can lead you astray. Researchers have developed an AI focused on improving the reliability of Wikipedia references by training the algorithms to identify citations on the website that are questionable. The program, called SIDE, does two things: check if a primary source is accurate and suggest new ones.

I don't think that anyone would dispute that Lethal Politics qualifies as a reliable source for Wikipedia. The blog from 2006 is a different matter. The estimates in both are identical as far as I can tell, so I think it would be pertinent that if Rummel has to be cited, we stick with the book, and not the blog which takes readers to a polemical, right-wing site.The site’s rules on reliable sources state: “Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published, sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared ...WP:BLP requires that any potentially defamatory information about a living person be sourced to a Wikipedia:reliable source (or to the person himself, in a published statement); court filings, or statements made under penalty of perjury, are not adequate. — Arthur Rubin 16:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC) ReplyAug 24, 2015 · A 2005 study in the journal Nature found that the information provided on Wikipedia is almost as reliable as that of the benchmark, Encyclopedia Britannica. A 2011 study found that Wiki articles ... Sep 5, 2023 · Here I’ve compiled a simple list of seven examples of unreliable essay sources which you should avoid referencing at all costs. These are sources that are not credible or reliable sources for essays. 1. Wikipedia. Okay, so here’s the deal. Read Wikipedia. Your friends do, your competitors do, and even your teachers do. Investing.com is a financial platform and news website; one of the top three global financial websites in the world. [3] It offers market quotes, [4] information about stocks, futures, options, [5] analysis, commodities, and an economic calendar .For example, Wikipedia:Reliable sources says newspaper articles are generally considered to be reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) recommends against newspaper articles for certain technical purposes. Editors must use their best judgement to decide which advice is most appropriate and relevant to the specific ...As a reliable source: * Sometimes. Ancestry.com contains two types of material, which have separate considerations. Official documents such as birth and death records come from reliable sources and can be used provided the restrictions discussed in WP:PRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY are obeyed. In all cases, a secondary source is preferred. Apr 20, 2011 · Second, Wikipedia was blamed for being too good. Like in the past with paper reference tools, students only used this one source for their papers. Is Wikipedia Reliable? If a person spends any length of time exploring Wikipedia it is clear that its quality has become very good. If available, academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources on topics such as history, medicine, and science. Editors may also use material from reliable non-academic sources, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include: University-level textbooks

Wiki-Transpose rely only on Wikipedia as information source for translations. The main goal of this paper is to check the coverage ratio of Wikipedia against specializedqueries …

v. t. e. In journalism, a source is a person, publication, or knowledge other record or document that gives timely information. Outside journalism, sources are sometimes known as "news sources". Examples of sources include but are not limited to official records, publications or broadcasts, officials in government or business, organizations or ...

Since 2018 Facebook has used Wikipedia to provide information buttons with the sources of news articles. ... embarrassments—and its own disclaimer that “Wikipedia is not a reliable source ...Reuters using Wikipedia as a source does not make Wikipedia a reliable source generally. WP:V : "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.", so if someone can cite that YA is a RS, or that the tabloid article for Chabad-Lubavitch article is a RS that would be a start.Used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement. ਫਰਮੇ ਦੇ ਮਾਪਦੰਡ [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. ਮਾਪਦੰਡ ਵੇਰਵਾ ਕਿਸਮ ਦਰਜਾ Reason reason Note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip …So, to summarize, it is true that Wikipedia is not a reliable source in academic circles. However, this does not have to mean that you can’t use it if you’re smart about it. Now that the reliability debate on Wikipedia is settled, once and for all, we can move on to the next part – how to effectively use Wikipedia for academic research …Snooker statistics must be sourced to a reliable source(s), and Snooker.info does not meet this criteria due to being self-published. We realize the problem, but replacing out of date information with unreliable information doesn't solve the problem. ... Cuetracker seems to be a pretty good webiste but I'm not sure it qualifies under the Wikipedia' "reliable source" …24 jul 2020 ... The Wikipedia community recently engaged in a spirited debate over whether Fox News is a reliable enough source to use as a citation in ...Per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Religious sources, religious sources may be accepted as a source for their own views, and such personal views should be presented in accordance with WP:RSOPINION. Religious scripture is a primary source and should be avoided per WP:PRIMARY, except for direct quotations. For everything else (history, …

WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources. 33,383 out of 6,720,579 articles. The list below provides the names of Korean sites that can and cannot be used as a source. If you want to request a source as reliable, submit your question for consensus. The same method if you want to question the reliability of a source.Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement. A source can only be considered reliable when the source's qualities are compared against the qualities editors ...There’s some disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source. Because it can be edited by anyone, many people argue that it’s easy for misleading information to be added to an article without the reader knowing. Others argue that because Wikipedia articles cite their sources, and because they are worked on by so ... Coal is important because it is a reliable and an affordable source of energy in many countries. It is responsible for about 40 percent of the electricity generated in the world. Coal is a crucial ingredient in manufacturing industries.Instagram:https://instagram. three steps of writingeu member states mapwsu student sports passrussell hays Dependence solely on Wikipedia for information can be a risky endeavour and highlights the importance of cross-referencing with the original sources provided in …Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file irregular mandatosu haul mileage calculator The best kind of sources for Wikipedia are reliable, third-party sources (not published by or related to the subject of the article). Wikipedia:Help with sources has more information about these and why they are needed. Unfortunately, the Simple English Wikipedia has many articles which do not have these kinds of sources, or in fact any sources ... Health information services. Employees. 279 (2018) URL. www .healthline .com. Healthline Media, Inc. is an American website and provider of health information headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was founded in 1999, relaunched in 2006, and established as a standalone entity in January 2016. midas lodi ca Sep 5, 2023 · Here I’ve compiled a simple list of seven examples of unreliable essay sources which you should avoid referencing at all costs. These are sources that are not credible or reliable sources for essays. 1. Wikipedia. Okay, so here’s the deal. Read Wikipedia. Your friends do, your competitors do, and even your teachers do. There’s some disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source. Because it can be edited by anyone, many people argue that it’s easy for misleading information to be added to an article without the reader knowing. Others argue that because Wikipedia articles cite their sources, and because they are worked on by so ... Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file